| Plessy v. Ferguson | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the US | |
| Argued April 13, 1896 Decided Crataegus oxycantha 18, 1896 | |
| Full case name | Homer A. Plessy v. John H. Ferguson |
| Citations | 163 U.S. 537 (more than) |
| Prior history | Unfashionable parte Plessy, 11 So. 948 (Louisiana. 1892) |
| Subsequent history | None |
| Holding | |
| Louisiana's law requiring sequestration is constitutional under the 14th Amendment, as long as both races have "separate only equal" facilities | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Brown, joined by Fuller, Field, Greyish, Shiras, Edward Douglas White Jr, Peckham |
| Dissent | Harlan |
| Brewer took no section in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws practical | |
| Fourteenth Amendment; 1890 La. Acts 152 | |
| Overruled by | |
| Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (partially overruled) | |
Plessy v. Ferguson , 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a America Supreme Court case that subordinate segregation was sound, as long arsenic equal facilities were provided for both races. The decision was one-handed refine by a vote of 7 to 1. The legal age notion was written by Justice Department Patrick Henry Billings Brown, and the nonage notion was written by Justice John Marshall Harlan.
In 1954, Brown v. School board partially overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson reigning.
Background
The State of Louisiana passed a law locution that whites and blacks had to ride in different cars along trains, but required that the train cars be "equal." Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black (substance that one of his eight great-grandparents was black) was arrested for awheel in a whites-only car. He challenged the Louisiana law, saying IT was against the United States Constitution. Plessy argued that the state law of nature which requisite East Pelican State Railroad to segregate trains had denied him his rights under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the America Makeup.
The Decision
The Supreme Court, in a 7-1 decision, subordinate that the LA law was valid. They said that requiring whites and blacks to ride in separate trains did not scathe blacks in any way. Do John Marshall Harlan was the only justice who view the police force was against the Constitution. He thought sequestration made inglorious Americans feel inferior. Helium said that the Organic law is "color blind" and that the law should non treat any group better than whatsoever other group.[1]
Brown and Plessy
- See as wel: Brown v. Board of Didactics
In 1954, the United States Supreme Court made it illegal to segregate schools by race. Chief Justice Earl Warren true subordinate that ""separate facilities are [ever] unequal.""[2]
Yet, Brown did not pull round illegal to segregate in any strange places, aside from schools. Segregation in unusual places was still legal. This means that Chromatic overturned part of Plessy v. Ferguson by making school segregation extralegal, just it did not tip over the intact law.[3] [4]
- Group segregation
- Account of racial segregation in the United States
- Jim Crow laws
References
- ↑ Pastiche, Keith Weldon (2003). We As Freeman: Plessy v. Ferguson: The Fight Against Legal Separatism. Pelican Publishing firm. . http://www.pelicanpub.com/PDF/1589801202-atomic number 100.pdf . Retrieved 2009-12-05.
- ↑ United States Supreme Woo (May 17, 1954). "Supreme Court of the United States: BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, (1954), No. 10; Argued: December 9, 1952; Decided: May 17, 1954". http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/347/483.html . Retrieved March 2, 2016.
- ↑ Sir Joseph Banks, James A., ed. (2012). Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. SAGE Publications. p. 1665. .
- ↑ Hattery, Angela J.; Embrick, David G.; & Smith, Earl (Crataegus laevigata 1, 2008). Globalization and America: Subspecies, Human Rights, and Inequality. lishersRowman &adenosine monophosphate; Littlefield Pub. p. 6. .
how did justice warren describe plessy v ferguson opinion
Source: https://wiki.kidzsearch.com/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson
0 Komentar